Originally Posted by
Megadeus
I'll start this off with an argument (for God's existance) that I once... heard?
It basically states that all of creation somehow managed to come together, and therefore, there must be a creator.
Clarify "creation" and "managed to come together". As far as I can tell, those statements already presuppose to existence of a creator, and so the argument is begging the question.
It can also be said that it seems extremely unlikely to the highest degree that a series of cosmic coincidences and accidents managed to create the many detailed and amazing things of nature, such as DNA.
Again, clarify "coincidences", "accidents", and "many detailed and amazing things of nature".
Originally Posted by
penguinzrock
But seriously, I believe that God created us all. If not him, who else? I'd just prefer not to believe that we were all one big chain reaction.
You have not demonstrated that a supernatural creator is necessary for or the most probable explanation for our existence. Compare your proposition with the equally ridiculous "But seriously, I believe that the Flying Spaghetti Monster created us all".
Originally Posted by
Starlit Azure
I believe in god, but I'm a science geek(:p).
You will be relieved to know, then, that Christianity (you're talking about the Christian deity, right?) provides a scientific hypothesis with which one can test its validity.I tell you the truth, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, 'Move from here to there' and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you." -- Matthew 17:20
Do you have have faith as small as a mustard seed? If so, you can conduct the experiment yourself. I would suggest levitating silverware.