If you wish to play that way, it's perfectly fine. I was just pointing out the severe diadvantages of doing so and fixing up the math a little. But, really, in the end, it's actually pretty hard to compare the weapons because of such significant differences in price.
As I said before, with BWs, you can get away with it because of the price. However, when it comes to axes, we start to encounter a lot of problems. First off, you're 8%/2% (2-h/1-h) weaker per attack. This is probably the least of your problems since you can easily overcome this with the higher base attacks, cheaper prices, etc. When you start considering weapon speed, things start to get a little scarier. While early levels axes have the same speeds, the later ones are always at least 4/8% slower, sometimes up to 20% when you start utilizing lionhearts, jap maps, etc. So, once again, this is another hit. Lastly, brandish slaps on a nice 11% penalty for you. So, looking at the numbers...
2-h: 92% * 96% * 89% = 78.6%
1-h: 98% * 92% * 89% = 80.2%
So, looking at these numbers we can easily see the axe saders do have a severe disadvantage. Now, if you don't care about the damage, go ahead. It only means that swords will be that much cheaper for everyone else.
I don't check the warrior section much. :x