Wyatt

[FailFTW]

I like your handwriting.

[Merciless]

Spoiler!

relevant

you deserve 500 cool points

you can redeem them anywhere I say

I forgot where though

[Tesiqurasa]

Spoiler!

relevant

This is one of those rare occasions where I can legitimately say, "I loled"

[turles]

[Bishopz]

relevant

You must have fun when you declare things relevant.

[Tesiqurasa]

So flip the bird.

On-topic: Do you believe in god y/n? Now stick with your answer and drop this thread. Sooner or later, it's going to get locked because of ONE stupid post that starts a flame war, and later a Hot Sands thread at the poster. What's one of the top things NOT to debate, especially on the Internet?

Religion.

So why debate it? If I believe you are all f*ggots, I will believe it, and you won't change my belief. As it is was I believe. Drop this ridiculously STUPID debate.

I wasn't saying it in the way you interpreted it. What I meant was, what is the POINT of a thread like this? To debate which religion will win the election in 2012? To make sure others feel the same as you do? To argue? If you all are cool about the thread, that's fine. I am not saying "stop posting bout' dem religions" as much as "Don't post religion if you don't want to start a flame war", or so to speak. Really, I just don't want another bulma thread to be created after he posts more manga, which will create drama, and spill out in to unneeded sections. If you all wish for me to not post any further, that is fine, as I do not debate religion. I debate the need to post or talk about religion. And one more thing before anyone says anything. I didn't say you all had a flame war going, I said I don't want one to happen.

Also ty for that pic, is mah new background.

pretty sure you were

[Wyatt]

pretty sure you were

Now look closer.

If you all are cool about the thread, that's fine.

Also, that post is not entirely connected with the other one. Either way, I am done posting in that thread afaik.

[Tesiqurasa]

It seems that you reworked your ideas with the second post after Penguinz rightfully criticized it. That was not at all the message in your initial statement. You clearly stated that we should stop posting in that thread, that the debate had no purpose, and that views cannot be altered online.

The second post was a cop out designed to make your first one seem more moderate and acceptable. The problem is that your first post was in no way moderate. You basically just posted two different ideas: an initial extreme post and a retract of that extreme post.

[Ryuuji]

I really don't care what Wyatt says about something he doesn't have knowledge about; I can always ignore comments. What I do feel offended is that a database moderator has the right to call people who debate on a touchy subject "***gots," while he is supposed to represent the community. Pretty unprofessional, no?

[bulmabriefs144]

I don't normally care (or notice) what Wyatt posts. But even I noticed that was kinda abrupt and rude.

I don't always like what ppl post about me in response to various threads I comment in. But people do have the right to argue whatever they want. And vice versa.