it's too much of a stretch
:|
lacking photographic sense tbh...
photography is about how well you can position yourself and the camera to take pictures that are natural but profound.
not about how well/badly you can edit it with pshop..
bolt202/veil225/feint200
The concept of showing rapid technological progress and the discarded remnants is good, but there needs to be something more to effectively convey that idea. I don't know about others, but I personally think photo-editing (working solely with the photo at least) should enhance a picture, not define it. Tools are only going to get you so far. I could have the greatest camera in the world and edit my photos with the greatest software, but unless I effectively use those tools, the result will be crap.
Study successful photographers and artists. Understand how they use things like lighting, balance, subject matter, and positioning to convey their ideas. Would the unedited "gameboy" picture give the same message? If not, how can you make it do so?
Spoiler!
1. Megapixels is not a measure of quality, only a measure of picture size. My Nikon D40 DSLR (6mp) will take much better pictures than 99% of all point and shoot cameras (that 1% being the Leica X100 and Fujifilm X1)
2. RULE OF THIDS :3
if you ever want to discuss photography, I am an award winning photographer who just got his first client last weekend.
>rule of thids
but yeah, rule of thirds.
it can be a ****ty picture, but it'll still look really ****ing nice.
bolt202/veil225/feint200